FAQs
- An imprecise definition of what kinds of rides and devices are regulated causing confusion to the public and amusement ride and device owners;
- An out of date safety code for the design, maintenance, and operation of amusement rides and devices creating a gap between the adopted code and current wise practices;
- An inability of the current regulation to adapt to newly developed rides and devices, creating a safety gap when new and novel designs are brought to British Columbia.
- The technical risks of the device, in relation to design, construction, operation, and maintenance;
- The degree of control a patron has over their exposure to risk in relation to the device, or the risk that arises from patron behaviour in or on the device;
- Any enhanced risks posed to a vulnerable population;
- Any gaps in regulatory oversight, because of a lack of regulators, engineering, safety codes, insurers, or similar factors;
- The ability for regulatory oversight by Technical Safety BC to increase safety.
What were the findings from reviewing the current BC regulations for amusement rides and devices?
The review highlighted certain challenges with the current regulations for amusement rides and devices in British Columbia. These challenges include:
Why propose changes to the existing regulations?
Technical Safety BC is proposing a shift in the regulatory approach to amusement rides to make sure that regulations keep up with innovation in the industry, and to put new wise practices, like operational safety management plans, into practice in BC.
How do you determine what category new and existing amusement devices fall under?
Technical Safety BC is proposing that the regulations would require that a Technical Safety BC safety manager consider specific criteria, established in regulation, when examining a new or novel amusement device to determine if, and under which category, it would be regulated. This criteria, which will also be used for determining the category that existing amusement rides and devices fall under, includes:
These considerations are intended to balance the need for the public to be reasonably assured that amusement devices do not pose unreasonable risks with the reality that almost all amusement activities carry some degree of risk that patrons must consciously and clearly accept.
Do you have a list of the proposed classification of rides and devices?
Below is the initial proposed classification of rides and devices both currently regulated and unregulated. This list is non-exhaustive and subject to change.
Proposed Regulatory Category | Ride or Device |
---|---|
Regulated Ride | Indoor skydiving Rollercoasters Rotating rides Tower rides Swing rides Ferris wheels Bumper cars Flume rides Bobsled and skeleton Wakeboard tow Mountain coaster Merry-go-round Dark rides (with passenger carrier units) Automated fun houses “Dining in the Sky” type ride Simulators Car rides Go-karts Bumper boats Train ride |
Regulated Device (Class 1) | Portable climbing walls Bungee jumps Ropes challenge course Trampoline court Stunt air bag Ninja gyms Inflatable trampolines Large dry slides Zipline (permanent and travelling) “Slide the City” type ride Waterslide (open and enclosed flumes) Waterslide (passenger carrying vehicle) Waterslide (lane and pool discharge) |
Regulated Device (Class 2) | Bouncy castle/House Inflatable obstacle course Inflatable dry slide Inflatable climbing wall Small dry slide |
Excluded from Regulation | Professional racing go-karts Coin-operated children’s rides (such as those found at malls) Zorbs Winter tube parks Mechanical bulls Via ferrata Gyroscopes |